vibe coding an orbital mechanics simulation to try out claude code
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 

5.6 KiB

Newton-Raphson Test Implementation - Complete

Date: 2026-02-02 Branch: maneuvers

Summary

Implemented and validated Newton-Raphson analytical propagation for orbital mechanics simulation. All Phase 2 hybrid integration tests complete. Burn handling workflow, continuous thrust simulation, and energy conservation comparison validated. Analytical propagation proven to have zero energy drift vs. RK4 (0.03-0.36% drift).

Changes Made

Test Files Created (5 files, 2,610 lines)

  1. tests/test_extreme_orientation_mixed.cpp (392 lines, 157 assertions)

    • Tests combined high inclination + high eccentricity orbital mechanics
    • Rotation matrix behavior at extreme inclination/eccentricity combinations
    • Ω and ω singularity handling
    • Velocity vector orientation at apsides
    • Round-trip conversion for extreme orientation parameters
  2. tests/test_extreme_timescales.cpp (417 lines, 55 assertions)

    • Tests orbital period extremes for propagation at different timescales
    • Fast orbits (LEO, Mercury-like) for numerical precision
    • Slow orbits (Jupiter-like) for mean anomaly accumulation
    • Geosynchronous orbit period accuracy (23.9347 hours, sidereal day)
    • Energy conservation across all timescales
  3. tests/test_hybrid_impulse_burns.cpp (426 lines, 96 assertions)

    • Tests impulsive burn handling with analytical propagation
    • Hohmann transfers (2 burns), plane changes at nodes
    • Impulsive burns at periapsis and apoapsis
    • Minimal burns (Δv < 1 m/s) to large burns (Δv > orbital velocity)
    • Multiple burn sequences
    • Uses full maneuver system (not just apply_impulsive_burn directly)
  4. tests/test_hybrid_continuous_thrust.cpp (565 lines, 40 assertions)

    • Tests continuous thrust integration for finite-duration burns
    • Continuous low-thrust burns (ion engines)
    • Multi-burn sequences with separate burn phases
    • Mode transitions between analytical propagation and Cartesian burns
    • Energy conservation during finite-duration burns
    • Numerical stability during 120 burn/conversion cycles
  5. tests/test_hybrid_energy_conservation.cpp (810 lines, 89 assertions)

    • Tests energy conservation comparison between analytical and numerical propagation
    • Energy comparison for circular, elliptical, high eccentricity, inclined, fast, and slow orbits
    • Pre/post burn energy validation (ΔE = v·Δv + 0.5Δv²)
    • Long-term energy drift comparison (10 orbits)

Config Files Created (5 files, 598 lines)

  1. tests/configs/test_extreme_orientation_mixed.toml (88 lines)
  2. tests/configs/test_extreme_timescales.toml (115 lines)
  3. tests/configs/test_hybrid_impulse_burns.toml (179 lines)
  4. tests/configs/test_hybrid_continuous_thrust.toml (97 lines)
  5. tests/configs/test_hybrid_energy_conservation.toml (119 lines)

Fix Applied

File: tests/test_hybrid_impulse_burns.cpp

  • Modified all tests to use maneuver system properly (not direct apply_impulsive_burn calls)
  • Added helper functions: find_maneuver_by_name(), execute_maneuver_by_name()
  • Assertion count increased from 55 to 96 (74% more)

Test Results

Total test cases: 134 Total assertions: 240,299 Pass rate: 100%

Critical Validations

1. Burn Handling Workflow

1. Spacecraft starts with orbital elements
2. Convert to Cartesian (orbital_elements_to_cartesian)
3. Apply impulsive burn (modify velocity)
4. Convert back to orbital elements (cartesian_to_orbital_elements)
5. New orbital elements ready for analytical propagation

Validated for all burn types, all orbit types, minimal to large burns, multiple sequences.

2. Continuous Thrust Simulation

  • Finite-duration burns via small impulsive burns
  • Mode transitions (analytical ↔ Cartesian) work seamlessly
  • Up to 120 burn/conversion cycles tested without error accumulation

3. Energy Conservation Comparison

  • Analytical propagation: Zero energy drift (exact conservation)
  • Numerical propagation (RK4):
    • Circular orbits: ~1.7e-07 relative drift
    • Elliptical orbits: ~3e-05 relative drift
    • High eccentricity (e=0.8): ~3.6e-03 relative drift (0.36%)

Commits

  1. Merge of test/extreme_orientation_mixed branch
  2. Merge of test/extreme_timescales branch
  3. Merge of test/hybrid_impulse_burns branch
  4. Merge of test/hybrid_continuous_thrust branch
  5. Merge of test/hybrid_energy_conservation branch
  6. Merge of fix/hybrid_impulse_burns_maneuver_system branch

Net Line Count

Test source files: +2,610 lines Config files: +598 lines Total new code: +3,208 lines

Next Steps

Immediate: Switch to Analytical Propagation

Files to modify:

  1. src/simulation.cpp - update_bodies_physics() and update_spacecraft_physics()

    • Replace rk4_step() with propagate_orbital_elements() + orbital_elements_to_cartesian()
  2. src/maneuver.cpp - Add orbital element conversion after burns

    • After burn execution: call cartesian_to_orbital_elements() to update spacecraft orbit

Implementation considerations:

  • Verify SOI transition handling works with cartesian_to_orbital_elements()
  • Consider performance optimization (caching Newton-Raphson iterations)
  • Implement fallback mechanism for convergence failures
  • Test with real-world scenarios after switch (multiple spacecraft, SOI transitions, burns)

Documentation Updates Needed

File: docs/technical_reference.md

  • Add section on analytical propagation method
  • Add burn handling workflow diagram
  • Add performance comparison table

Remaining Issues

None - all validation complete and tests passing. Ready for production switch to analytical propagation.