|
|
|
|
@ -5,33 +5,8 @@ This document outlines planned enhancements and future development areas for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Immediate Priorities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### More Accurate Integration Methods |
|
|
|
|
**Current:** RK4 (Runge-Kutta 4th order) integration |
|
|
|
|
**Proposed:** Newton-Raphson propagation for higher precision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Benefits:** |
|
|
|
|
- Improved accuracy for long-term orbit predictions |
|
|
|
|
- Better handling of near-parabolic trajectories |
|
|
|
|
- Reduced numerical drift in N-body systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Considerations:** |
|
|
|
|
- May require adaptive timestep sizing |
|
|
|
|
- More complex than RK4 |
|
|
|
|
- Trade-off between accuracy and performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Reference Frame Switching |
|
|
|
|
**Current:** Fixed global/local coordinate frames per body type |
|
|
|
|
**Proposed:** Dynamic reference frame selection based on orbital regime |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Use Cases:** |
|
|
|
|
- Spacecraft transitioning between planetary SOIs |
|
|
|
|
- Interplanetary trajectories needing optimal precision |
|
|
|
|
- Multi-body perturbation modeling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Benefits:** |
|
|
|
|
- Optimal numerical precision for all orbit types |
|
|
|
|
- Automatic frame selection based on physics state |
|
|
|
|
- Better simulation stability during SOI transitions |
|
|
|
|
### 3D Orbital Elements |
|
|
|
|
### Spacecraft and Maneuver Visualization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Mid-Term Enhancements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -51,6 +26,19 @@ This document outlines planned enhancements and future development areas for the
|
|
|
|
|
- Add validation tests for energy/momentum conservation |
|
|
|
|
- Consider relative velocity of parent bodies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### More Accurate Integration Methods |
|
|
|
|
**Current:** RK4 (Runge-Kutta 4th order) integration |
|
|
|
|
**Proposed:** Newton-Raphson propagation for higher precision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Benefits:** |
|
|
|
|
- Improved accuracy for long-term orbit predictions |
|
|
|
|
- Better handling of near-parabolic trajectories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Implementation Considerations:** |
|
|
|
|
- May require adaptive timestep sizing |
|
|
|
|
- More complex than RK4 |
|
|
|
|
- Trade-off between accuracy and performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Io and Titan Orbital Stability Tuning |
|
|
|
|
**Issue:** Outer solar system moons exhibit orbital drift |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -100,16 +88,6 @@ This document outlines planned enhancements and future development areas for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Enhanced UI Features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Search Functionality:** |
|
|
|
|
- Text search for bodies/spacecraft by name |
|
|
|
|
- Filter by mass, parent, orbital parameters |
|
|
|
|
- Keyboard shortcuts for quick access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Multiple Selection:** |
|
|
|
|
- Select multiple bodies for comparison |
|
|
|
|
- Batch operations for group editing |
|
|
|
|
- Comparative information display |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Orbital Metrics Panel:** |
|
|
|
|
- Real-time orbital element display |
|
|
|
|
- Period prediction |
|
|
|
|
@ -125,21 +103,6 @@ This document outlines planned enhancements and future development areas for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Advanced Physics Features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### N-Body Perturbations |
|
|
|
|
**Current:** 2-body approximation (only parent influence) |
|
|
|
|
**Proposed:** Full N-body gravitational interactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Benefits:** |
|
|
|
|
- More realistic moon orbits |
|
|
|
|
- Trojan point detection |
|
|
|
|
- Perturbation-based trajectory corrections |
|
|
|
|
- Multi-body SOI modeling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Performance Considerations:** |
|
|
|
|
- O(N²) complexity for all-body interactions |
|
|
|
|
- May need spatial partitioning for large N |
|
|
|
|
- Selective N-body for nearby bodies only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Atmospheric Drag |
|
|
|
|
**Use Case:** Spacecraft reentry and low orbit decay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -149,18 +112,10 @@ This document outlines planned enhancements and future development areas for the
|
|
|
|
|
- Altitude-dependent density |
|
|
|
|
- Reentry trajectory prediction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Tidal Forces |
|
|
|
|
**Application:** |
|
|
|
|
- Orbital decay for close satellites |
|
|
|
|
- Tidal locking evolution |
|
|
|
|
- Roche limit calculations |
|
|
|
|
- Tidal acceleration for moons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Testing and Validation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Expanded Test Suite |
|
|
|
|
- Reference frame transition tests |
|
|
|
|
- N-body interaction validation |
|
|
|
|
- Long-term stability benchmarks (> 1000 orbits) |
|
|
|
|
- Regression testing for numerical drift |
|
|
|
|
- Performance profiling tests |
|
|
|
|
@ -245,14 +200,7 @@ This document outlines planned enhancements and future development areas for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Research Directions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Relativistic Corrections |
|
|
|
|
- Perihelion precession of Mercury |
|
|
|
|
- General relativistic orbit adjustments |
|
|
|
|
- Light-time corrections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Non-gravitational Forces |
|
|
|
|
- Solar radiation pressure |
|
|
|
|
- Magnetic field interactions |
|
|
|
|
- Thrust modeling for powered flight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Orbital Determination |
|
|
|
|
|